The Decipherment of Linear B and the Secrets of Mycenaean Civilization: A Journey Through Clay and Language
The decipherment of Linear B is one of the most significant archaeological and linguistic achievements of the 20th century. It opened a window into the hitherto largely unknown world of the Mycenaean civilization, revealing details about their economy, social structure, religion, and political organization. This essay will delve into the story of the decipherment, the process involved, and the insights gained about the Mycenaean world.
I. The Discovery of Linear B:
Our story begins on the island of Crete, at the Palace of Knossos. Arthur Evans, a British archaeologist, excavated Knossos starting in 1900. He unearthed vast quantities of clay tablets inscribed with two scripts, dubbed Linear A and Linear B. He also discovered a third, older, hieroglyphic script.
- Linear A: This script was found primarily in Crete and used by the Minoan civilization. It remains undeciphered to this day. Its language is unknown and likely unrelated to Greek.
- Linear B: This script was found primarily in Crete but also later on the mainland of Greece, most notably at Mycenae, Pylos, and Tiryns. This geographically wider distribution hinted at a potential connection to the Greek mainland.
- Evans' Predisposition: Arthur Evans believed that both Linear A and Linear B represented a non-Greek, indigenous language of Crete. He was convinced that the Minoans were a unique and advanced civilization unrelated to the later Greeks. This preconceived notion, while understandable given the Minoans' clear sophistication, significantly hampered early decipherment efforts.
II. The Decipherment Process: From Guesses to Grammar:
For decades, scholars attempted to decipher Linear B, but they were hampered by a few factors:
- Insufficient Data: The number of available tablets was relatively limited at first.
- Evans' Influence: Evans' authority and his insistence on a non-Greek origin for the language dissuaded many from pursuing Greek connections.
- The Nature of the Script: Linear B is a syllabic script, meaning that each symbol represents a syllable (e.g., "ka," "ti," "ro"). This makes decipherment more challenging than deciphering an alphabetic script where each symbol represents a single sound.
Several individuals made important contributions to laying the groundwork for the eventual decipherment:
- Alice Kober: This American classical scholar meticulously analyzed the Linear B tablets. She noticed patterns of inflection, suggesting that the language was inflected, similar to Greek, Latin, or Sanskrit. She created "grids" or "chessboards" where she cataloged the frequency and distribution of different signs, grouping those that appeared to be related through inflectional changes. Kober's work was crucial in demonstrating that the script was likely not purely logographic (where each symbol represents a word or concept) but contained phonetic elements.
- Emmett Bennett: An American linguist, Bennett developed a standardized system of cataloging the Linear B signs. This made it easier for scholars around the world to communicate and collaborate on the decipherment. His system is still used today.
III. Michael Ventris and the Breakthrough:
The crucial breakthrough came from Michael Ventris, a young British architect with a passion for ancient languages. Ventris, amateur though he was, had been fascinated by Linear B since his childhood. He built upon the work of Kober and Bennett, and crucially, he was willing to challenge Evans' long-held assumptions.
- Ventris' Initial Doubts: Initially, Ventris, like Evans, believed Linear B was non-Greek. However, he kept encountering inconsistencies that made a non-Greek interpretation difficult to maintain.
- The "Greek" Hypothesis: In 1952, Ventris circulated a groundbreaking "Work Note" arguing that Linear B might, in fact, represent an early form of Greek. He had noticed certain recurring combinations of signs appearing on tablets from both Knossos and Pylos. He theorized that these combinations might be place names known from later Greek texts.
- Pylos Place Names: Ventris focused on place names like Knossos, Amnisos, and Pylos (written Pu-ro in Linear B). He recognized that Linear B was likely syllabic and began to assign phonetic values to certain signs based on their frequency, context, and potential connections to known place names.
- Confirmation with Tripos: Ventris' theory was dramatically confirmed when he and his colleague, John Chadwick, deciphered the word ti-ri-po-de, appearing on a tablet depicting tripods. Tripos is the Greek word for tripod. This provided compelling evidence that Linear B was indeed Greek.
- The Final Decipherment: Working together, Ventris and Chadwick continued to decipher the tablets, systematically assigning phonetic values to the remaining signs based on their context and relationship to known Greek words. They published their findings in the seminal work, Documents in Mycenaean Greek (1956), definitively proving that Linear B encoded a form of Greek older than Homeric Greek.
IV. What We Learned: Unveiling Mycenaean Society:
The decipherment of Linear B revolutionized our understanding of Mycenaean civilization. Here are some of the key insights gained:
- Greek Identity: The Mycenaeans were definitively Greek speakers, making them the ancestors of the later classical Greeks. This dispelled the notion that the Mycenaean civilization was entirely separate from Greek history.
- Economic Administration: The Linear B tablets are primarily administrative documents. They reveal a sophisticated system of centralized palace economies. The tablets record inventories of goods, lists of personnel, rations, taxes, and even details about the livestock.
- Social Structure: The tablets reveal a hierarchical society. At the top were the Wanax (king) and his officials. Below them were various classes of artisans, farmers, shepherds, and slaves. Land ownership was complex, with some land held by the palace and some held by individuals.
- Religious Practices: The tablets mention various deities, some of whom are familiar from later Greek mythology, such as Zeus, Hera, Poseidon, and Athena. They also record offerings and rituals, providing valuable insight into Mycenaean religious practices.
- Military Organization: The tablets provide information about the Mycenaean military, including the number of chariots, horses, and warriors. They also mention the manufacture and distribution of weapons. The emphasis on weaponry and warfare suggests a society frequently engaged in conflict.
- Palace Life: The decipherment has allowed scholars to reconstruct details of palace life, including the types of goods produced and stored, the food eaten, and the activities of the palace officials.
- Insights into the Greek Language: The language of the Linear B tablets is an early form of Greek, known as Mycenaean Greek. It provides valuable insight into the development of the Greek language and its relationship to other Indo-European languages. It shows features like the preservation of the w sound (later lost in classical Greek), as well as different dialectal variations.
- The End of Mycenaean Civilization: While the tablets don't directly describe the collapse of Mycenaean civilization, they do provide some hints. The increasing number of tablets related to military preparedness suggests a period of growing instability and conflict in the Late Bronze Age. The tablets fall silent around 1200 BC, coinciding with the widespread collapse of Bronze Age societies in the Eastern Mediterranean, leaving the causes of the decline open for ongoing research and debate.
V. Limitations and Ongoing Research:
While the decipherment of Linear B provided a wealth of information, it is important to acknowledge its limitations:
- Administrative Focus: The tablets are primarily administrative in nature, providing little insight into areas such as literature, philosophy, or art.
- Fragmentary Evidence: The surviving tablets represent only a small fraction of the original record. They are also often fragmentary and difficult to interpret.
- Specialized Vocabulary: The vocabulary used in the tablets is often specialized and technical, making it difficult to understand the full meaning of the texts.
- Ongoing Debate: While the basic decipherment is widely accepted, many details remain subject to debate and interpretation.
Despite these limitations, the decipherment of Linear B stands as a remarkable achievement. It has opened a window into the lost world of the Mycenaeans, allowing us to hear their voices, understand their society, and appreciate their contribution to the development of Greek civilization. The ongoing research and re-evaluation of Linear B texts continues to refine our understanding of this fascinating and pivotal period in ancient history. The story of its decipherment also serves as a testament to the power of collaborative scholarship, the importance of challenging established assumptions, and the enduring allure of unraveling the mysteries of the past.